Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., et al.
LAST UPDATED: NOVEMBER 8, 2016
Federal Trade Commission, State of Illinois, Commonwealth of Kentucky, and State of North Carolina, Plaintiffs v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc.; FHTM, Inc.; Alan Clark Holdings, LLC; FHTM Canada, Inc.; Fortune Network Marketing Limited; Paul C. Orberson; and Thomas A. Mills, Defendants.
FTC MATTER/FILE NUMBER: 112 3069
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 13 CV 578
FEDERAL COURT: Northern District of Illinois
CASE TIMELINE
November 8, 2016
PRESS RELEASE: FTC Returns More Than $3.7 Million to People Harmed by Pyramid Scheme
September 14, 2015
FTC v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. (6th Cir.), Brief of the Federal Trade Commission
May 13, 2014
Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgmen
PRESS RELEASE: FTC Settlement Bans Pyramid Scheme Operators From Multi-Level Marketing
January 28, 2013
Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order with Asset Freeze, Appointment of a Receiver, Other Equitable Relief, and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
Memorandum In Support of Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion For A Temporary Restraining Order With Asset Freeze, Appointment of A Receiver, Other Equitable Relief, and An Order To Show Cause Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief
PRESS RELEASE: FTC Action Leads Court to Halt Alleged Pyramid Scheme
For more information, see here: https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/112-3069/fortune-hi-tech-marketing-inc-et-al
These materials were obtained directly from the Federal Government public websites and are posted here for your review and reference only. No Claim to Original U.S. Government Works. These may not be the most recent versions. The U.S. Government may have more current information. We make no guarantees or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of this information or the information linked to. Please check the linked sources directly.
