Payday Lending

Legal Compliance Guides & Checklists

Payday Lending Case Studies

Our Case Studies resource page offers quick access to litigation cases that shape the landscape of legal compliance. By exploring these real-world examples, subscribers gain valuable insights into how legal precedents are established and how they impact business operations and legal strategies.

Stay tuned for our analyses of case studies that will provide a detailed examination of significant court decisions, highlighting their implications for compliance practices and regulatory interpretations to not only enhance your understanding of complex legal scenarios but also offer practical lessons to help you navigate and anticipate compliance challenges effectively.

 

Get Compliant, Stay Protected! Visit our comprehensive CLIClaw Marketing Compliance Library for essential resources and step-by-step guidance to ensure your business is fully compliant.

FTC v. Caprice Marketing LLC, et al. (Payday Loans)
FTC v. Direct Benefits Group, LLC, et al. (Payday Loans)
FTC v. Moneymaker, et al. (Negative Option, Payday Lending, Deceptive Marketing)
FTC v. Payday Financial, LLC, et al. (Payday Loans)
FTC v. Swish Marketing, Inc., et al. (Payday Loans, Deceptive Marketing)

Return To Legal Compliance Guides & Checklists

These materials were obtained directly from the U.S. Federal Government public websites, U.S. State Government public websites, or the International Government public websites and are posted here for your review and reference only. No Claim to Original U.S. Government Works, Original U.S. State Government Works, or Original International Government Works. This information may not be the most recent version. The U.S. Government, U.S. States, or International Governments may have more current information. We make no guarantees or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of this information, or the information linked to. Please check the linked sources directly.