FTC Cracks Down on Deceptive “Free” Weight-Loss Offers and What Marketers Need to Know
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has recently taken action against two companies involved in deceptive online marketing practices. These businesses lured consumers with "free" weight-loss samples, only to secretly enroll them in costly subscription programs. This move by the FTC highlights the growing scrutiny around online marketing tactics, especially those using "negative option" offers, where a consumer’s failure to cancel an offer is considered acceptance of ongoing charges.
The companies involved were accused of making misleading claims about their products, such as LeanLife PM and Woman’s UltraSlim, promising weight loss benefits or enhanced male sexual function. Consumers were led to believe they were simply covering the shipping and handling costs for a free sample. What they didn’t know was that they were being signed up for a continuity program that would charge them anywhere from $30 to $100 every few months unless they proactively canceled their subscriptions. This type of marketing, known as "negative option," is now under the FTC’s microscope, and businesses need to pay attention to this case and its implications.
The charges brought against these companies weren’t limited to misleading claims about their products. The defendants also violated the Electronic Fund Transfer Act by debiting customers’ accounts without their clear consent. Not only did the companies fail to properly disclose the terms of their offers, they also continued to charge consumers who attempted to cancel or never explicitly agreed to ongoing payments.
The settlements with the companies involved now bar them from using deceptive marketing tactics, including misrepresenting any offer as “free” when there are actual costs or obligations involved. The defendants are also prohibited from using customer billing information to continue charging unless they receive clear and informed consent. Additionally, they must provide full and clear disclosures of all terms before asking for any payment information, including cancellation policies and refund terms.
For businesses in the marketing space, particularly those using subscription-based models or offering "free" trials, this case serves as an important reminder about the need for transparency. If you’re promoting products or services online, especially through a subscription model, clear communication is key. Ensure that customers understand exactly what they are agreeing to, including any potential charges, how they can cancel, and what their obligations are. Misleading consumers can result in serious legal and financial consequences, as demonstrated by this FTC settlement.
So, how can your business stay on the right side of the law while still successfully marketing your products? First and foremost, always provide full disclosure of your terms and conditions. If your offer involves automatic shipments or recurring payments, make sure that consumers are well-informed before they enter their billing information. Clear, conspicuous disclosures before the consumer makes a purchase are not just good practice, they’re now a legal requirement. Additionally, be cautious about any claims you make about your product’s effectiveness. Ensure that your marketing materials are truthful, not misleading, and supported by reliable evidence.
If you're using subscription-based services or offering trial periods, take the time to review your current marketing practices to ensure they align with these guidelines. If necessary, consult with a legal professional to ensure your campaigns comply with FTC regulations. With proper transparency and honest communication, you can build a trustworthy brand that consumers feel confident engaging with, which ultimately helps foster long-term loyalty and success.
Take the next step and audit your marketing strategies today. Avoiding potential pitfalls now can save your business from legal headaches down the road.
If you would like to read more about this case and others, visit our Case Studies Library.
(Image Credit: iStock Photo)
This article is for information purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be relied on as legal advice for any particular matter.